Strong dictatorship is better than weak democracy

Intheir budget deficit has reached billion. It is perhaps the time of an able, strong-minded, powerful dictator to take hold of the country and cleanse the entire system… A benevolent visionary, who can lead by example and get the things done with speed and perfection.

It is done to teach a lesson, one hard to learn. With a capable leader, strong dictatorship has an advantage over weak democracy in a sense that the dictator can make decisions efficiently.

Not only formulate and implement the concepthe also took to the field to check the development process. Dictators have ruled in many countries and region of the world for years; Latin America, Africa, Caribbean and Asia especially the Middle East.

For this reason, many people have put forward the idea that democracy is undesirable for a developing country in which economic growth and the reduction of poverty are top priority. Even the world's most powerful state, the US elects the American president for a term of four years and an additional term, following which he cannot seek presidency again.

Do we need another Hitler or Saddam Hussain. In the long run, dictatorships are not successful and they are overthrown by the people in the form of revolt or the mistakes of the dictatorship himself, unleashing war.

The political leaders squabble and fight among themselves. No consensus in fragile democracy In a dictatorship, there are no riots against the government or its affiliates, a single party is more likely in power, the ruler has unlimited power, plans are executed efficiently and in a fashion manner, most efficient during emergencies, and less room for corruption.

While many, like Wittman, have argued that democracies work much the same way as the free market and that there is competition among parties to prevent oppression by the majority, others have argued that there is actually very little competition among political parties in democracies due to the high cost associated with campaigning.

For example, Fierlbeck Fragile democracy weak Rule of law, freedom of judiciary and press are vital for democracy. In Ecuador, elected President Rafael Correa, who has displayed a strong authoritarian streak, recently won legislation that would grant him expansive new powers.

The Chinese government provides has better roads, railways, airports, ports, manufacturing facilities, than neighboring democratic India. Taxes are usually low, because income is not an issue. Others criticize democracy for being immoral on the grounds that it coercively involves people, i.

New leadership possible in a democracy Democracy derives its power from all of the people, and not just a small group.

Is Strong Dictatorship Better Than Weak Democracy??

Init is 1. Init is 1. Democracy stands for freedom, initiative and rule of law. People can and do get into trouble for speaking out against the government. It still remains the Achilles heel of democratic government.

At this juncture, a strong dictator may appear better than a fragile democracy. Overall improvement of society Democracies foster growth in the arts, sciences, literature, invention, and innovations of every kind.

A Strong Dictatorship is Better than a Weak Democracy

Suharto is a serious leader seeks community prosper. He argues democracy is efficient based on the premise of rational voters, competitive elections, and relatively low political transactions costs.

Strong Dictatorship or Fragile Democracy - Which is better?

In the history of this world you can see that a strong dictatorship leads countries to strong nations. At this juncture, a strong dictator may appear better than a fragile democracy. It is perhaps the time of an able, strong-minded, powerful dictator to take hold of the country and cleanse the entire system… A benevolent visionary, who can lead by example and get the things done with speed and perfection.

Fragile democracy not representative of the people While the majority of a population is represented, there is always going to be a portion of the population that is not, in a fragile democracy.

Dictatorships unstable It goes without saying that there is no allowance for political diversity, and often no allowance for individual expression or creativity in a dictatorship. All men and women are equal in the eyes of the law and their freedom of speech, expressions and thought cannot be taken away without due process of law.

A strong dictatorship can protect its people and offer them comfort in their life. Nov 14,  · Is a strong dictatorship better than a weak democracy? Discussion in 'Strategic & Foreign Affairs' started by VisionHawk, Dec 30, Jul 13,  · Strong Dictatorship like what happened in Singapore is good because the country can progress because there is only one making policies for the state unlike a Weak Democracy like in the Philippines where the politicians are always bickering making the country stagnant winforlifestats.com: Resolved.

Strong Dictatorship or Fragile Democracy - Which is better?

Democracy, as Sir Winston Churchill observed, is the worst form of government except others. Even a fragile democracy is better than a strong dictatorship for. Democracy, as Sir Winston Churchill observed, is the worst form of government except others.

Even a fragile democracy is better than a strong dictatorship for. A strong, benevolent dictator is far better than a weak democracy. However, from the immense and honestly, pretty endless list, of horrific dictators it is apparent that human beings do not have the personal strength and maturity to hand a position of absolute power.

This House Believe that Strong Dictatorship is Better than Weak Democracy

Feb 07,  · Is a strong dictatorship better than a weak democracy? Discussion in ' Strategic & Foreign Affairs ' started by VisionHawk, Dec 30, Page 2 of 3.

Strong dictatorship is better than weak democracy
Rated 3/5 based on 86 review
Strong Dictatorship or Fragile Democracy - Which is better?